India denies rights for surrogacy mothers

The country where mothers were worshiped as gods denies surrogacy mothers legal status. And she have no legal or any customary rights over the child. The rights of the surrogacy mother was put an end by a gestational surrogacy agreement and the intended parents in the agreement will have all the legal rights over the child born on surrogacy. The ICMR guidelines 2005 even denies the visitation rights of mother for the child delivered by her which was in the mothers paradise for 9 months and 10 days. The child born by surrogacy have on records as mother and father only the intended parents not the surrogacy mother. And no need for the court to interfere in this matter and the agreement signed by the parties in the surrogacy will prevail. The Indian laws only recognize the intended mother as the legal mother. The parental responsibility only applies to the intended parents and the surrogate mother cannot claim any right over the child. Surrogacy is a well known method of reproduction whereby a woman agrees to become pregnant for the purpose of gestating and giving birth to a child she will not raise but hand over to a contracted party. She may be the child's genetic mother (the more traditional form for surrogacy) or she may be, as a gestational carrier, carry the pregnancy to delivery after having been implanted with an embryo. In some cases surrogacy is the only available option for parents who wish to have a child that is biologically related to them. Even the surrogacy mother cannot change her mind before the child birth and she will be always in the clutch of surrogacy agreement and she will be penalized for violation of the agreement. The Mother goddess are now converted in to child vending machines and even denied some basic rights which the world customs provided. As per the IMCR guidelines the surrogacy child cannot seek the information of the genetic parents and surrogacy parents until the child reaches 18 years. And even after that the child cannot get the information of the name and address of the gamete donor and the surrogate is excluded from the information. In this juncture the state should enact laws for the rights of surrogacy mother and child from (i) deprivation and violation of child rights (ii) non-implementation of laws providing for protection and development of children and (iii) non-compliance of policy decisions, guidelines or instructions aimed at mitigating hardships to and ensuring welfare of the children and to provide relief to such children, or take up the issues arising out of such matters with appropriate authorities. For all your queries write to Daniel & Daniel Whattsapp Service No.9840802218.

Will Muslim men loose divorce rights

Will Muslim men undergo lawlessness for Divorce when Triple Talaq is banned in India. Now Triple talaq comes under the scanner of Judicial review of the Indian constitution by the supreme court of India in Shayara Bano v. Union of India case. In India fastest divorce is obtained by the Muslim men’s. There is no court to decide the case or no grounds of divorce for Muslim men’s to dissolve the marriage. But for Muslim women’s the dissolution of Muslim marriage Act, is the solution to get divorce from proper court for the limited grounds they have. In case of men there was no barrier or bondages in dissolving their marriage expect to pay maintenance for the iddat period which is maximum 3 month’s and to return the mahar amount. In India the state cannot enact any law which are gender biased under Article 15. It is on the open platforms that Triple talaq is against women’s and gender biased. Muslim men’s get divorce very faster than other men’s who want to wait for decades in the family court. And even in mutual consent an Hindu and a Christian should wait 6 months period after filing the case to have a decree under mutual consent with an pre-condition that the couples are separated one and two years before filing the case for Hindus and Christians respectively. But for the Muslims there was no such waiting period for mutual consent divorce, since they had no codified law except their personal law read with section 65 of Verma Act. Some deliberate discussions are going on whether personal law will come under the ambit of the state law. Some arguments are going the gender biased is the scale for the enactment of state laws and not for personal laws. Even on the recommendations of the law commission of India the gender biased personal laws of Hindus are converted in to gender equality codified laws. The abolition of coparcenery system and equal rights of property for women’s are the modern revolutionary laws in India. The draconian personal laws are now codified in to the rights protection laws. To put an end for all this disputes the Indian parliament should enact codified laws for the governance of Muslim matrimonial disputes as the other religions have their own in this country. Strucking of Triple Talaq without proper laws will bring only chaos in the Muslim community. For all your queries write to Daniel & Daniel Whattsapp Service No.9840802218.